I would recommend keeping to the speed limit, obeying all traffic laws and spray this stuff on anyway, can’t hurt to be more protected, especially if you can’t see it on the plate. Its worth a shot.

I saw it on the news one night and the police seemed really concerned about it.

I’m sure it works most of the time, but who knows.

yeah, its worth a shot

Umm, watch Myth Busters....this does not work!

Of course it doesn't work and the technology to compensate for such a "device" would render it worthless in a very short matter of time.

Here's an idea though, that does work: If you don't want a ticket, then don't run red lights and don't speed and then you have no issue.

This is the kind of crap that condones illegal behavior by morons who end up costing innocent people their lives by acting irresponsibly and negligently.

Read up on the stats of deaths caused by red light runners and speeders. It's very sobering.

Read up on the statistics and you will find several studies that prove that intersections with photo enforced radar actually show an increase in accident rates. The problem that I have with these cameras is that they are owned and operated by a private company that profits from fining the general public. Does this mean that I can purchase a radar gun and start clocking traffic and issuing fines payable to me. Where do you want to draw the line?
In Gwinnett County Georgia , they have adjusted the “yellow” time on the lights in conjunction with the installation of these cameras. A private company is installing over 150 cameras in our county and has offered to split the revenue with the county and city. The first camera they installed as a demo produced over $150,000.00 in fines in one weekend. The intersection tested is known for traffic congestion and traffic jams not for reckless drivers sailing through the red light at a high rate of speed. Keep on believing the “safety” angle, it’s about profits plain and simple.

Read up on the stats yourself and you will find that running red lights is extremely dangerous, but that speeding can even be safer than driving the limit in certain circumstances & rarely the primarily accident cause at other times.

There are alot more positive videos to support that it works compared to the product failing. Mythbuster's cannot use the exact camera used on the "red light cameras" so they decided to use a high quality digital camera. Ofcourse it will take different shots in the day because Mythbuster's cameras doesn't use a 500 watt bulb to make sure the shot comes out but instead their camera will use what's needed to make the picture clear.

Redlight cameras uses a 500 watt bul and there's a 50/50 chance in the day that it might catch the plate but if these cameras were taking these shots at night it would be a different story. I've purchased the photoblocker myself and have been flashed by these cameras a few times after having the product. it's been over 4 months and I have not received any tickets in the mail so I'm pretty sure it works. The tickets in my town runs $190's a shot and it's usually sent in the mail within 4-6 weeks after the shot was taken.

After applying the product 4 times on my rear plate I took a picture with my standard $200 digital camera and it came out overexposured so imagine a 50 watt flash hitting your plate while crossing the red lights......do you think you'll get a ticket????

umm hello..mythbusters is a show.. do you believe everything you see on tv?? NO! i have done the research and i know exactly what the stats are.. so before you go calling everybody who is against the traffic lights morons.. do some research and know what you're talking about before opening you mouth..

yeah, these traffice lights increase the number of accidents, are often managed by private for profit companies, that do sleazy things like shorten the yellow time. I got caught going through one on Flatbush avenue. Not only was the light not synchronized with the other lights, the yellow was much shorter. In effective in improving safety, dishonest, and another ploy for the city to rake in the cash.

The facts prove that rear end collisions have increased wherever these cameras go up. My vote is if I'm in a situation where somebody is barreling down on me from behind and I have the choice of going through a late yellow or slightly worse or getting rear ended and having neck or back injuries, I'm going to run the light and get out of the way. I say spry your plate and hope that you don't get tagged. I am a safe driver but weird stuff happens to everybody, even cops. It sounds like the guest near the top is an angry little cop, he probably has his little ticket book in his hand right now.

I SAY GOOD ON YA! FK THE NEW WORLD ORDER! all laws were made to be broken! who made them laws anyways only the power freaks who wanna stay in power !!! SPEEDING KILLS !!

This does not work - to prove that, all you have to do is look at HOW they took the pictures for the shots on the website and on this page... they are head on, WITH a flash on, which is what this product relies on to \"hide\" your plate number. You can see the reflection of the flash on the car. Speed cameras like the ones used at intersections are usually in a higher position and at an angle, and even if they did use flash, the distance from the flash to the subject would render this product useless, since the light would be GREATLY diffused at that point.

You buy this, you are a royal SUCKER!

I think it goes without saying that if you want to avoid a ticket, don\'t run red lights or speed. That is not what this thread is about. The thread is about a spray that supposedly reflects the flash of a radar activted camera, preventing plates from being read. So, lets stick to that. Wanting to learn about or understand other methods of preventing tickets doesn\'t mean you are a criminal or a deviant.

P.S. You will be hard pressed to find definitive studies proving that speeding alone causes an increase in traffic accidents/fatalities. UCLA conducted a 1 year (in 2004) study of traffic accidents in downtown Los Angeles. They determined that speeding itself had very little to do with accidents. According to the study, its \"disruption in the flow of traffic\" that causes accidents. With the exception of rush hour jams (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) (4:00-6:00 p.m.), motorists drive an average of 12 miles over the speed limit. It is disruptions in the flow of traffic that caused accidents. If the limit is 55 and traffic is moving at 67... you better be doing 67.

It DOES WORK ! Of course myth busters is going to say that it doesn't work. It is not something they want to really promote. I understand that you do not want to run red lights purposely. However sometimes due to morons that fail to put signal lights in front of you or break for no particular reason while you are behind them making you get caught at an intersection, then it would not be such a bad thing. I mean... have you ever driven in New York City ? Say no more !